patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Huguely Convicted of Second-Degree Murder

George Huguely, the University of Virginia lacrosse player facing first-degree murder charges in the death of ex-girlfriend Yeardley Love of Cockeysville, was convicted on the lesser offense of second-degree murder Wednesday.

 

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA—A jury convicted George Huguely V of second-degree murder and grand larceny Wednesday in the 2010 death of ex-girlfriend Yeardley Love.

The Chevy Chase native, now 24, was found guilty on charges he beat Love, 22, to death in her Charlottesville apartment. The jury, however, did not find that Huguely premeditated the killing—which would have been necessary to convict him of the first-degree murder charge that likely would have carried a life sentence.

The jury took nine hours to reach a verdict before announcing it just before 7 p.m. The jury will next recommend Huguely's sentence, though Judge Edward Hogshire will have the final say. Second-degree murder carries a five to 40 year sentence, while grand larceny carries one day to 20 years in prison.

Huguely, dressed in a gray coat and khakis, showed no visible emotion as Hogshire read the verdict forms. Huguely's and Love's family members were present in the courtroom when the verdict was read.

Love, a Cockeysville native, attended Notre Dame Preparatory School. Huguely attended the Landon School in Bethesda. Both played lacrosse at the University of Virginia. 

Huguely faced six charges, including first-degree murder, felony murder, grand larceny, statutory burglary, burglary and robbery. If convicted of first-degree murder, Huguely could have faced 20 years to life in prison. Involuntary manslaughter carries a maximum 10-year sentence. 

Wednesday, Huguely was found guilty of grand larceny and not guilty on charges of first-degree murder in commission of a robbery, robbery, buglary with intent to commit larceny and statutory burglary.   

Huguely burst into Love's off-campus apartment on the night of May 2, 2010, after a day of what friends and teammates said was heavy drinking.

In testimony, friends and former teammates painted a grim picture of Huguely as a hard-drinking, jealous college senior who had a stormy relationship with Love.

Huguely had gotten into fights with Love in the months leading to her death, prosecutors said.

"I should have killed you," he wrote in an email to Love shortly before her death, after learning of an affair with a University of North Carolina lacrosse player.

That email was found on a computer which Huguely stole from her apartment and attempted to throw away the night of her killing.

Huguely himself declined to testify, but in a taped interview with investigators, before his arrest, Huguely sounded shaken by word of Love's death and denied that he killed her.

Attorneys on both sides agreed that Huguely was in her apartment and that there was some sort of altercation, but the defense argued Huguely was not directly and completely responsible for Love's death.

Medical experts called by the defense claimed Love died not from blunt force trauma, as ruled by the medical examiner, but by asphyxiation after suffocating in a pillow.

The jury heard closing statements following nearly two weeks of testimony in a rare Saturday court session, then began deliberations on Wednesday morning. 

A sentencing hearing is expected to begin after a short break.

Related Topics: George Huguely, George Huguely Murder Trial, University of Virginia, Yeardley Love, and Yeardley Love Murder Trial

Buzz Beeler

8:31 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Juries are becoming as inept as judges when it comes to justice or any comprehension of the term.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nicholas Richardson

9:35 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Can you add specificity to your comment? Is this a reference to the Huguely-Love trial? What is your point? Did you want 1st degree? 3rd degree? No grand larceny? I'm curious. Do you have a better method in mind?

Harry Callahan

9:30 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

A-A-A-A-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L R-R-R-R-I-I-I-I-G-G-G-G-G-H-H-H-H-H-T-T-T-T!!!!!! Justice is served. I hope this sorry scumbag lives out a long, sorry, life behind bars alternating between having his backside kicked by ganstas and trying to buy protection from the shot-callers by being their girlfriend.

Reply

Red Dolphin

9:52 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

the judge has the discretion to give him the 40 years to hell with the lesser charge

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Tyler Waldman

8:33 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Actually, under Virginia law, the judge can only set a sentence at or below what the jury recommends. On the other hand, Virginia does not have parole, so he will serve all of that time, less good behavior credits.

Buzz Beeler

10:12 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Nicholas, yes and it's called accountability for ones actions. O.J., Casey Anthony a baby killer in the city receiving 10 months, John Gotti and Larry Singleton for starters.

http://www.nytimes.com/keyword/lawrence-singleton.

Being a cop for 39 years gave me some insight into some issues.

http://www.crimevictimsunited.org/measure11/murderguidelines.htm

As to my comment regarding accountability, let's see - breaking into ones home while drunk after threatening to kill them, beating that person up and leaving them to die face down on a bed while stealing their computer that had the threat on same, that is first degree.

A death in the commission of a felony is considered murder in the first degree. As quoted in the Sun, "He urged the jury to convict the defendant of felony murder, for allegedly committing the crime while in the process of robbery ... "

Law is far from a science.

Reply

XTC

6:16 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

The guy is lucky - just think if he had been caught offering links to movies or music he might have gotten 50 years (like the Megaupload dudes are being threatened with) although he is not as lucky Michael Jacksons killer who will probably be out after just 3 years served....

Luck? Nahhh, just a totally screwed up justice system...

Reply

Other Tim

8:21 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Everyone here is basing his or her comments on what they read in the newspaper or heard on television or radio. The people in the jury heard all the evidence. Maybe they knew more of the facts than you.

Reply

Buzz Beeler

10:02 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Tyler, good point. I had no clue to their - no parole - policy. In Maryland before they addressed the good time credits, inmates were being released even before their first parole date.

The judge does have a wide latitude in sentencing.

Reply

Donna

11:10 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

That "wide latitude in sentencing" has created nightmares for law-abiding citizens in our communities. We have some serious criminals who have 3 violations of probation and are still out doing their drug dealing while they wait for a court date. The plea deals are constant with minor charges being brought forth and the more serious crimes being held Nolle Prosequi. I now this to be true in many cases I have kept tabs on through the court website. It's so sad that the police literally put their lives on the line and get these guys off the streets, only to have them back the next day doing the same thing. Then the crimes escalate to drive-bys and residents living in fear. Prosecutors and judges should be held accountable for the harm they do to communities.

Reply

Leave a comment