Olszewski, Jr.: Toll Increases Demand MTA Change
The Maryland Transportation Authority is scheduled to pass unprecedented toll increases Thursday despite public outcry, the state delegate says.
Once again, the Maryland Transportation Authority seems poised to use its non-elected position to pass along ill-advised toll increases on residents of southeast Baltimore County and the entire Baltimore metropolitan region. This decision comes despite considerable public outcry, suggesting that the members were either not listening or did not care about what local residents had to say.
Indeed, plans to raise the basic round-trip rates at all Baltimore-area crossings to $8 (up from the current $4) for a round trip beginning in 2013 remain intact. Meanwhile, the MTA did agree to scale back the proposed hike at the Bay Bridge (from $8 to $6), leaving an unfair balance intact amongst the state’s toll facilities.
I find it incomprehensible as to why the authority believes that a bridge more than twice the size of our Francis Scott Key Bridge should have a lower toll rate.
It also appears the MTA will not take actions to prevent an unprecedented increase in commuter rates, slated to rise 250 percent, from 80 cents a round-trip to $2.80 a round trip – costing more than $500 annually for a single daily commuter! All the while, users of the Hatem Bridge will have access to unlimited crossings for a mere $20 per year.
Ironically, toll rates are set to increase at every toll facility in the state except at one location that is driving the need for the authority to find more operating capital: the Intercounty Connector.
One small improvement from the original plan that I agree with is to remove the $1.50 per month administrative fee for EZ-Pass users. Still, that change is no consolation for the thousands of our residents that rely on these transportation systems to access employment, education and child care.
Unfortunately, these increases are not subject to review by the General Assembly or the governor. In response, I will be working with my colleagues in District 6 and from around the state to pursue a couple of policy changes.
One option is to remove the toll-setting authority from these unelected individuals and place the responsibility back where it belongs: with the executive and the legislature.
Additionally, I plan to push for new state income tax provisions that will allow residents living in close proximity to the toll facilities to deduct the costs of tolls (regardless of the purpose of the travel) on their state tax returns. Such a deduction would not fully offset the increased expenses we can all expect, but it will certainly help blunt the impact.
In the meantime, I strongly encourage you to contact the secretary of transportation, who also sits on the MTA board that makes these decisions, to express your frustration and disappointment. Likewise, I encourage you to contact the governor’s office to let him know that you are not pleased with the outcome, and that you expect him to help those impacted during the upcoming legislative session.
I remain committed to fighting for you every day as your delegate on this and every issue.
State Del. John A. Olszewski, Jr. can be reached via email at john.olszewski@house.state.md.us. His district phone number is 410 282-1733.
Roxane
8:05 am on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
"I find it incomprehensible as to why the authority believes that a bridge more than twice the size of our Francis Scott Key Bridge should have a lower toll rate." Really, Mr. Olszewski? I bet it's all about which facility will generate more money. The legislature created this monster when it gave the MTA the power to do what it wants, when it wants. Of course, the little guy will pay the price. Sounds just like Washington, doesn't it?
Peace and Love
8:41 am on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Roxanne, do you realize that Mr. Olszewski is standing up against the increases? Why do you use such a negative tone with someone who is on your side? Perhaps you should investigate a little more. You anger is certainly understandable, but why not direct it to the Maryland Department of Transportation or to the MD Transportation Authority instead?
Peace and Love
8:43 am on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Just FYI, MTA is the Maryland Transit Administration (formerly Mass Transit Administration) -- you know, the bus people. MdTA is the Maryland Transportation Authority, which is the agency being discussed here.
Roxane
11:11 am on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
I did not direct my ire to the MdTA (I know what it means) because, Peace and Love, the MDTA doesn't have to answer to anyone. Mr. Olszewski does. Was he in office when our representatives in Annapolis gave the agency carte blanche? Maybe you can find out that info and let me know. Peace and Love....
Jimmy Thompson
1:26 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Roxane, I'm with Peace and Love on this one. The ability to raise tolls was given to the MdTA well before Mr. Olszewski took office, and he's said that it's wrong for unelected folks to be passing along the increases. I also note that he even supported a bill that would have eliminated the funding for the ICC and saved taxpayers over $1 billion, and greatly reduced the need (if not eliminated the need) for these toll increases. You can find it here: http://mlis.state.md.us/2008rs/fnotes/bil_0001/hb1471.pdf
So, I also think your anger is sorely misdirected. Personally, I'm glad the Delegate is taking up the cause and trying to stand up for his community.
Donald M. Ford
5:40 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
If they stop taken money out of the fund for other things not related to hyw and bridge
repairs, they would not have to raise the tolls. They do the same thing with SS and Medicare.
Joe Dolan
8:46 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
The last time they raised the tolls I requested the help of the Delegate and he told me that thee was nothing he could do because the MdTA had the authority to raise the tolls. Now he chooses to act. Had he done it previously maybe this would not be happening.
I long for the days when we had influential politicians on the east side.
Jimmy Thompson
8:09 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Sounds like he was just being honest with you. If I'm not mistaken, wasn't that first toll increase (under Ehrlich, in 2006) his first year in office -- and those increases occurred before he even had a full session under his belt? Moreover, I think his 2008 bill very directly speaks to "doing something," as de-funding the ICC would have stopped future toll increases and possibly even allowed the first increase to be revisited.
I long for the days when people used to stop using politicians as an excuse for not doing anything to help themselves and their community.
Sean Douglas Franklin
9:19 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Joe Dolan, you should commute using the ID-10-T lane. Here is someone who is trying to help the situation and you rail against him. Perhaps if elected officials had more backing instead of complaining from constituents more would be done for our area. Just saying, enjoy your commute.