.

Court Strikes Down Portion of Sex Offender Registry Law

The Maryland Court of Appeals rules that people convicted of sex crimes prior to 2009 do not have to register with the state.

Some people convicted of sex crimes prior to the existence of the state's sex offender registry may no longer have to register with the state Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, according to a ruling by the Maryland Court of Appeals.

The split decision, issued Monday, struck a registry requirement, imposed upon the defendant by legislation passed later, on the basis that it violated a clause in the Maryland Declaration of Rights prohibiting retroactive laws.  [A copy of the ruling is attached to this story.]

"Registration was imposed, over twenty years later in 2009, under the sex offender registration statute as a direct consequence of petitioner’s commission and conviction for his sex crime. The application of the statute has essentially the same effect upon petitioner’s life as placing him on probation and imposing the punishment of shaming for life, and is, thus, tantamount to imposing an additional sanction for Petitioner’s crime," the court wrote in it's majority opinion.

The ruling stems from a case involving an unnamed person convicted in Washington County of a sex crime that occurred nearly 20 years ago. The sex offender registry was not created until 1995.

The unnamed defendant was a junior high school teacher accused of a sex offense involving a 13-year-old student during the 1983-1984 school year. The defendant was later convicted by guilty plea in 2006.

The crime committed by the unnamed petitioner occurred while in high school. In 2009 and 2010, the General Assembly added a number of requirements including one requiring juvenile sex offenders to register with the state Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services.

The 2009 amendment required offenders like the unnamed teacher who committed prior to Oct. 1, 1995 but convicted on or after Oct 1, 1995 to register. The 2010 amendment ultimately required the teacher to register for the rest of his life.

The teacher's lawyer argued that the lifetime registration was not part of the original plea agreement.

But Court of Appeals Judge Glenn Harrell, in a separate opinion wrote law requiring the unnamed teacher to register did not violate the state's Declaration of Rights. Harrell went on to say that the teacher should not be required to register for another reason.

"Instead, I would direct specific performance of Mr. Doe’s guilty plea, not to include requirement of registration as a child sexual offender," Harrell wrote, adding that he found the majority opinion "faulty."

Harrell wrote that "a correct reading of [the Declaration of Rights] and the most relevant cases leads to the conclusion that Doe is not entitled to the relief he seeks on the constitutional arguments he makes."

Harrell said he would order the Washington County Circuit Court to enforce the plea bargain as it was agreed to, which did not include a requirement to register.

In a dissenting opinion, Court of Appeals Judge Mary Ellen Barbera wrote that adding the registration requirement more than a decade later was not a violation of state law.

"The state and the court made no promises in the plea agreement or during the plea hearing that Petitioner would not have to register as a sex offender," Barbera wrote. "Indeed, the plea agreement is silent on the matter, which was acceptable under the law, given the collateral nature of the registration requirement. Because there was no agreement with petitioner that he would not be subject to the collateral consequence of registration as a sex offender, either at the time of the plea or at some future time, it follows that there was no “breach” of the agreement entitling him to the relief he now seeks."

JB March 13, 2013 at 11:45 PM
Good points. Plus, John Walsh, the big advocate for this law, admitted to having a relationship with an underage girl himself. Plus the sponsor of this law in Congress, Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) was caught sexting 16 year old boys in the Congressional Page Program and resigned in lieu of prosecution. Neither of these guys are subject to the AWA. Big surprise. So, in order to deflect from their own criminal actions, these jerks pushed laws like these to make them look like heroes. Yeah, heroes in the bedrooms of underage kids more like it. Never trust a politician, and never trust a politician who states "I want to pass a law to protect kids". That just means that they need votes.
JB March 13, 2013 at 11:46 PM
They are permanent records. However, why do only sex offenders have registries? Not gang members or domestic abusers who kill hundreds of kids annually?
Chuck Burton March 14, 2013 at 01:02 AM
It's all part of the fascizification of America. We are already about a hair away from full dictatorship. All Obama, or any president has to do is declare a national emergency for any reason, and take over. Maybe he will, maybe he won't, but it's his choice and no one's else. The sheeple will go along with the herd leader. Anyone who resists will go into the concentration camps.
Steve March 14, 2013 at 02:41 AM
Ha Ha Ha Chuck if you don't like it maybe you should move somewhere else.
Chuck Burton March 14, 2013 at 02:24 PM
If I had the wherewithall, and were a bit younger, I probably would. The trouble is just about every nation today is fascist or socialist to some degree. There is no libertarian country to my knowlege.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »